AI-Powered Automation & Content Creation for Businesses
Helping businesses leverage AI, automation, and integrations to streamline workflows and supercharge content creation.
The future of business is AI-driven. I specialize in creating AI-powered solutions that automate processes, integrate seamlessly with your existing tools, and generate content effortlessly. Whether it's WhatsApp and Telegram automation, AI voice agents, or AI-generated videos and images, I help businesses stay ahead of the curve. Let's explore how AI can work for you.
About Me
With over 25 years of experience in IT consulting and over 15 years in photography and videography, I've always been at the forefront of technology and creativity. My journey from visual storytelling to AI innovation has given me a unique perspective on how automation, AI integrations, and content generation can revolutionize businesses.
I now focus on:
- •Developing AI-powered mobile apps
- •Automating workflows with WhatsApp, Telegram, and CRM integrations
- •Creating AI-generated content for businesses, including video and image automation
- •Leveraging local LLMs for secure and powerful AI solutions
Businesses today need to embrace AI to stay competitive. Let's connect and explore how AI can transform your operations.
Services
AI-Powered Mobile Apps
Custom-built AI applications that streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and provide innovative solutions tailored to your business needs.
Automations & Integrations
Seamlessly integrate AI into your business operations with WhatsApp, Telegram, email marketing, and CRM automation.
Voice AI Agents
Enhance customer interactions with AI-driven voice agents, providing automated responses and intelligent customer support.
Local LLM Solutions
AI chatbots and tools that run locally, ensuring privacy, security, and speed for businesses needing on-premise AI.
AI-Powered Content Generation
Revolutionize social media and marketing with AI-generated videos, images, and automated content creation.
Past Work Experience
While I've built a strong foundation in photography and videography over the past 15 years, I've now refocused my expertise on AI solutions and mobile development to help businesses innovate and grow.
Psssst…Did you know this website was built with AI?
Not only that
It also scores a perfect 100% on Google PageSpeed Insights for both mobile and desktop.
Why is that important?
Because it means the site loads lightning-fast, works flawlessly on any device, and delivers a smooth experience for every visitor. In other words, no waiting, no glitches—just instant access to what matters. That’s the power of combining smart design with AI precision.
Latest AI News
Claude Sonnet 4.6 for OpenClaw: Should You Replace Opus?
Feb 18, 2026
Claude Sonnet 4.6 introduces a major shift in how AI agents can be deployed at scale. While it may not outperform Opus in every niche benchmark, it delivers nearly identical performance in most agentic tasks — at roughly a fraction of the cost. For teams using OpenClaw or Claude Code, this dramatically changes operational economics. <br><br> <ul> <li><a href="#overview">What Sonnet 4.6 Changes</a></li> <li><a href="#benchmarks">Agent Benchmarks: What the Numbers Mean</a></li> <li><a href="#economics">Why Cost Multiplies Capability</a></li> <li><a href="#openclaw">What This Means for OpenClaw Users</a></li> <li><a href="#usecases">Two High-Leverage Use Cases You Can Run Today</a></li> <li><a href="#coding">Coding: Where Sonnet Fits (and Where It Doesn’t)</a></li> <li><a href="#strategy">Model Strategy by Plan Tier</a></li> <li><a href="#risks">Risks, Limitations & Guardrails</a></li> <li><a href="#outlook">Strategic Outlook</a></li> </ul> <br> <h2 id="overview">What Sonnet 4.6 Changes</h2> Sonnet 4.6 is faster and significantly cheaper than Opus, while performing almost identically in most agentic tool-use scenarios. In recent comparisons: • Agentic computer-use benchmark: 72.5% vs 72.7% (effectively identical) • Comparable performance in office-task automation • Better speed • Roughly one-fifth the price This matters more than raw intelligence gains. For agent workflows, performance parity at lower cost means scale. <br><br> <h2 id="benchmarks">Agent Benchmarks: What the Numbers Mean</h2> Benchmarks suggest Sonnet 4.6 matches Opus 4.6 in: • Computer control tasks • Tool usage • Multi-step office automation • Financial analysis workflows It is slightly weaker in heavy coding tasks, particularly complex architectural refactors. But for: • Spreadsheet manipulation • Presentation building • Trend research • Structured automation It performs at near parity. For OpenClaw — which relies heavily on tool orchestration and system control — that makes Sonnet 4.6 highly attractive. <br><br> <h2 id="economics">Why Cost Multiplies Capability</h2> The biggest shift isn’t intelligence. It’s affordability. When Opus was the only reliable agent brain, users faced: • API bills reaching hundreds or thousands per month • Hesitation to run long overnight sessions • Reluctance to experiment with multi-day workflows With Sonnet 4.6 costing about 80% less: • Overnight automation becomes viable • Continuous research loops are affordable • Multi-hour data scraping workflows are less risky • Iterative experimentation increases Cost efficiency doesn’t just save money. It increases usage frequency. And frequency drives output. <br><br> <h2 id="openclaw">What This Means for OpenClaw Users</h2> Previously, Opus 4.6 was effectively the only viable brain for OpenClaw if you wanted high-quality results. Now: • Sonnet 4.6 delivers similar agentic reasoning • It runs faster • It costs dramatically less For OpenClaw users on API billing: Switching to Sonnet 4.6 may reduce costs by 70–80% while maintaining workflow quality. For Claude Code users: Use Sonnet 4.6 for: • UI adjustments • Layout changes • Minor feature additions • API wiring • Refactoring small modules Reserve Opus for: • One-shot major architectural rewrites • High-risk system redesign • Complex reasoning-heavy implementation This layered strategy improves cost-performance balance. <br><br> <h2 id="usecases">Two High-Leverage Use Cases You Can Run Today</h2> 1. Self-Improving Skill Discovery Workflow: • OpenClaw scans X and Reddit hourly • Identifies trending use cases • Drafts three new skill proposals • Recommends one • You approve implementation Optional: Schedule it daily at 02:00. This creates a self-evolving agent that improves based on community behavior. With Sonnet 4.6, this becomes financially sustainable. Previously, running social scraping loops for days could generate significant API costs. Now it becomes a manageable operational expense. <br><br> 2. Autonomous Feature Prototyping Prompt: “Review the full codebase. Identify 3 potential feature expansions. Build a working prototype for one. Schedule nightly execution.” Because Sonnet 4.6 supports large context windows (including 1M token beta capability in broader Anthropic ecosystem models), it can ingest large repositories. Result: • Your app proposes improvements nightly • Generates initial implementations • Documents reasoning You wake up to working prototypes. The key shift: Apps begin self-extending under supervision. <br><br> <h2 id="coding">Coding: Where Sonnet Fits (and Where It Doesn’t)</h2> Important nuance: Sonnet 4.6 is slightly weaker than Opus in advanced coding benchmarks. For OpenClaw coding-heavy workflows: Consider: • Use Sonnet for minor tasks • Use Codeex or other optimized coding models for heavy code generation • Use Opus for complex multi-file architectural changes Hybrid routing reduces cost while preserving quality. <br><br> <h2 id="strategy">Model Strategy by Plan Tier</h2> If you are on: $20 or $100 tier plans: Use Sonnet 4.6 as your default model for nearly everything. $200 tier: Use Sonnet for daily workflows. Use Opus selectively for strategic tasks. API-based OpenClaw users: Switch primary brain to Sonnet 4.6 immediately. Keep Opus as fallback escalation. The economic benefit is too significant to ignore. <br><br> <h2 id="risks">Risks, Limitations & Guardrails</h2> 1. Overconfidence Lower cost encourages more automation. Risk: Unchecked agents running long loops. Mitigation: • Hard step limits • Budget caps • Logging and review checkpoints <br><br> 2. Coding Edge Cases Risk: Subtle logic errors in complex architecture. Mitigation: • Test automation • Staged deployment • Human code review <br><br> 3. Agent Drift Running long self-improving workflows may create unexpected behavior shifts. Mitigation: • Version-controlled skill updates • Prompt review cycles • Evaluation metrics Cost reduction should not remove governance discipline. <br><br> <h2 id="outlook">Strategic Outlook</h2> Sonnet 4.6 appears purpose-built for agent ecosystems. Anthropic’s messaging emphasizes: • Computer use • Tool orchestration • Scalable execution This suggests strategic intent: Make agent infrastructure affordable. If models become cheap enough to run continuously: • Agents operate 24/7 • Research loops run autonomously • Apps self-extend nightly • Businesses increase automation density The biggest shift is not intelligence. It’s sustainable autonomy. When you can run five times more workflows for the same budget, the constraint becomes imagination — not cost. And that changes competitive dynamics dramatically.
OpenAI Acquires OpenClaw: Why Multi-Agent AI Is Going Mainstream
Feb 17, 2026
OpenAI integrating OpenClaw is not about adding “another AI feature.” It represents a shift toward structured, multi-agent execution systems becoming part of mainstream AI platforms. <br><br> <ul> <li><a href="#what-happened">What exactly happened</a></li> <li><a href="#why-it-matters">Why this matters strategically</a></li> <li><a href="#multi-agent-workflows">Multi-agent workflows becoming mainstream</a></li> <li><a href="#open-source">Open source implications</a></li> <li><a href="#security">Security and governance: real risks</a></li> <li><a href="#use-cases">Concrete workflow use cases</a></li> <li><a href="#teams">Impact on teams and product development</a></li> <li><a href="#outlook">What happens next</a></li> </ul> <br> <h2 id="what-happened">What exactly happened</h2> OpenAI has integrated OpenClaw into its broader roadmap around personal AI agents. Leadership behind OpenClaw joins OpenAI, while the project remains open source and continues to be supported. That combination matters. This is not a tool being absorbed and hidden. It is agent infrastructure being elevated. OpenClaw focused on structured autonomy: – tool execution – multi-step planning – workflow memory – controlled agent behavior By bringing this into a larger AI ecosystem, OpenAI is signaling that agents are moving from experimental playgrounds to operational systems. <br><br> <h2 id="why-it-matters">Why this matters strategically</h2> Until now, most AI usage has been reactive. You prompt. It answers. You decide what happens next. Even sophisticated workflows required human orchestration between each step. Agent systems introduce structured execution. Instead of: “Write a weekly report.” You can move toward: “Collect metrics from analytics dashboards, compare against last month, generate a summary, create three slide-ready charts, and draft the management email.” That is execution, not assistance. If OpenAI builds this into its ecosystem, we will see agent-based workflows integrated into daily tools, not just developer experiments. <br><br> <h2 id="multi-agent-workflows">Multi-agent workflows becoming mainstream</h2> Multi-agent systems allow specialization. Instead of one model doing everything, you create role-based agents. Example: Product development workflow • Agent A monitors GitHub issues and clusters them by priority • Agent B drafts implementation for low-risk fixes • Agent C runs automated test analysis • Agent D reviews code style and documentation consistency • Agent E prepares a structured pull request These agents operate in parallel but within defined boundaries. Humans supervise the system rather than execute each step manually. This reduces context switching and speeds up iteration cycles. <br><br> Example: Marketing operations • Agent 1 analyzes last quarter’s campaign metrics • Agent 2 drafts A/B copy variations • Agent 3 generates visual assets based on brand templates • Agent 4 validates tone against brand guidelines • Agent 5 prepares ready-to-upload ad packages Instead of juggling tools manually, the workflow becomes structured and repeatable. <br><br> <h2 id="open-source">Open source implications</h2> Keeping OpenClaw open source is significant. It allows: – external auditing of agent behavior – faster iteration on architecture – community-driven security hardening – transparent permission models This accelerates standardization. We are likely to see: – better logging frameworks – clearer agent permission structures – sandboxed execution environments – shared best practices for agent orchestration Open source keeps experimentation decentralized, even as infrastructure consolidates. <br><br> <h2 id="security">Security and governance: real risks</h2> Agents with tool access introduce operational risk. Let’s be concrete. Risk 1: Over-permissioned agents If an agent has unrestricted access to email, cloud storage, and production servers, a misconfiguration could cause data leakage or accidental deletion. Prevention: – strict least-privilege setup – separate environment tokens – segmented tool access per agent <br><br> Risk 2: Token exposure Agents logging raw API responses may accidentally store secrets. Prevention: – secrets vault integration – automatic redaction in logs – restricted environment variables <br><br> Risk 3: Execution loops An agent repeatedly attempting to fix an error could consume API budgets or overload systems. Prevention: – maximum execution steps – cost caps – human review checkpoints <br><br> Risk 4: External prompt injection If agents process external web content without filtering, malicious instructions could alter behavior. Prevention: – sanitization layers – strict task boundary enforcement – allow-listed domains As agents become operational, governance becomes infrastructure. <br><br> <h2 id="use-cases">Concrete workflow use cases</h2> Finance operations: • Agent pulls monthly expense exports • Detects anomalies vs historical baseline • Generates structured report • Flags outliers for human review The human validates decisions, not raw data. <br><br> Customer support: • Agent categorizes incoming tickets • Suggests draft responses • Escalates high-severity cases • Logs resolution metrics automatically Human agents focus on edge cases. <br><br> Research teams: • Agent monitors competitor updates • Summarizes feature changes • Compares pricing shifts • Generates a weekly briefing document Instead of manual browsing, intelligence gathering becomes systematic. <br><br> <h2 id="teams">Impact on teams and product development</h2> The biggest shift is not speed. It is role compression. Developers spend less time on repetitive implementation. Marketers spend less time formatting assets. Operations teams spend less time compiling reports. Managers shift from task supervision to system supervision. AI becomes an execution layer, not a suggestion engine. <br><br> <h2 id="outlook">What happens next</h2> If OpenClaw-style agent infrastructure becomes core product inside OpenAI, expect: – OS-level integrations – enterprise permission frameworks – agent marketplaces – standardized communication protocols between agents The conversation will shift from: “Can AI help with this task?” to: “Can AI run this process?” That is a fundamentally different model of work.
Get in Touch
Want to explore how AI can work for you? Reach out today!