AI-Powered Automation & Content Creation for Businesses

Helping businesses leverage AI, automation, and integrations to streamline workflows and supercharge content creation.

The future of business is AI-driven. I specialize in creating AI-powered solutions that automate processes, integrate seamlessly with your existing tools, and generate content effortlessly. Whether it's WhatsApp and Telegram automation, AI voice agents, or AI-generated videos and images, I help businesses stay ahead of the curve. Let's explore how AI can work for you.

About Me

With over 25 years of experience in IT consulting and over 15 years in photography and videography, I've always been at the forefront of technology and creativity. My journey from visual storytelling to AI innovation has given me a unique perspective on how automation, AI integrations, and content generation can revolutionize businesses.

I now focus on:

•Developing AI-powered mobile apps
•Automating workflows with WhatsApp, Telegram, and CRM integrations
•Creating AI-generated content for businesses, including video and image automation
•Leveraging local LLMs for secure and powerful AI solutions

Businesses today need to embrace AI to stay competitive. Let's connect and explore how AI can transform your operations.

Services

AI-Powered Mobile Apps

Custom-built AI applications that streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and provide innovative solutions tailored to your business needs.

Automations & Integrations

Seamlessly integrate AI into your business operations with WhatsApp, Telegram, email marketing, and CRM automation.

Voice AI Agents

Enhance customer interactions with AI-driven voice agents, providing automated responses and intelligent customer support.

Local LLM Solutions

AI chatbots and tools that run locally, ensuring privacy, security, and speed for businesses needing on-premise AI.

AI-Powered Content Generation

Revolutionize social media and marketing with AI-generated videos, images, and automated content creation.

Past Work Experience

While I've built a strong foundation in photography and videography over the past 15 years, I've now refocused my expertise on AI solutions and mobile development to help businesses innovate and grow.

Photography

Photography Collection

A selection of high-quality commercial and artistic photography work.

Videography

Video Production

Professional video content for businesses and creative projects.

Psssst…Did you know this website was built with AI?

Not only that

It also scores a perfect 100% on Google PageSpeed Insights for both mobile and desktop.

Why is that important?

Because it means the site loads lightning-fast, works flawlessly on any device, and delivers a smooth experience for every visitor. In other words, no waiting, no glitches—just instant access to what matters. That’s the power of combining smart design with AI precision.

Latest AI News

Claude Code Agent Loops Explained: What /loop Really Does and What It Doesn’t

Mar 8, 2026

There is a lot of hype around Claude Code’s new Agent Loops feature and, unfortunately, a lot of confusion too. Some posts make it sound like Anthropic just released a fully autonomous 24/7 background agent that runs forever. That is not what this update is. Agent Loops are genuinely useful, but their value comes from focused, session-based automation, not from unlimited autonomy. <ul> <li><a href="#what-it-is">What Agent Loops actually are</a></li> <li><a href="#what-it-is-not">What Agent Loops are not</a></li> <li><a href="#how-it-works">How /loop works in practice</a></li> <li><a href="#real-use-cases">Useful real-world use cases</a></li> <li><a href="#limitations">The limitations that people keep skipping</a></li> <li><a href="#schedule-vs-loop">When to use /loop vs scheduled tasks</a></li> <li><a href="#team-workflows">How teams can use it without disrupting work</a></li> <li><a href="#bottom-line">The bottom line</a></li> </ul> <h2 id="what-it-is">What Agent Loops actually are</h2> Claude Code now supports scheduled prompts inside an active session through /loop. The feature allows developers to run prompts repeatedly, poll for status updates, and set one-time reminders within the same coding session. This means Agent Loops are best understood as session-scoped recurring tasks. They help Claude repeat useful work while your session remains open, rather than turning Claude Code into a permanently running background daemon. In plain language: this is very good for “keep an eye on this and tell me when something changes.” It is not the same thing as “run my business forever while I sleep.” <h2 id="what-it-is-not">What Agent Loops are not</h2> The biggest misconception is that /loop creates a truly persistent autonomous agent. In reality, Agent Loops are tied to the session where they are created. They are designed for temporary automation during a working session, not for permanent background operations. <ul> <li>A forever-running background worker</li> <li>A persistent service that survives terminal restarts</li> <li>A cloud agent that keeps operating after your local session disappears</li> <li>A replacement for production schedulers or durable automation infrastructure</li> </ul> <h2 id="how-it-works">How /loop works in practice</h2> The /loop command allows you to schedule a prompt to run repeatedly at a given interval. You can specify a time interval and a prompt, or simply provide a prompt and let Claude repeat it periodically within the current session. Typical examples include: <ul> <li>“Check every 10 minutes whether the deployment finished.”</li> <li>“Every 20 minutes, re-run my PR review command.”</li> <li>“In 45 minutes, check whether integration tests passed.”</li> </ul> These loops run between interactions with Claude. If Claude is busy answering another request when the scheduled time arrives, the task will run once the system becomes idle. <h2 id="real-use-cases">Useful real-world use cases</h2> Deployment monitoring during release windows Instead of manually refreshing dashboards, you can instruct Claude to periodically check whether a deployment finished and summarize any changes. This reduces context switching and allows developers to stay focused on the work that actually requires attention. Pull request babysitting During active coding sessions, loops can monitor CI status, watch for new review comments, or alert you when builds finish. This is especially helpful when waiting for feedback or test results while continuing other tasks. Monitoring long-running builds or tests Integration tests and large builds often require occasional attention. A loop can periodically check logs or build status and notify you when something changes. <h2 id="limitations">The limitations that people keep skipping</h2> There are several important constraints that often get overlooked in hype posts. <ul> <li>Loops automatically stop after a maximum of three days.</li> <li>They do not survive restarts of the terminal or Claude Code.</li> <li>They exist only inside the active session where they were created.</li> <li>If Claude is busy when a scheduled moment passes, the task runs once when the system becomes idle rather than catching up multiple missed runs.</li> </ul> <h2 id="schedule-vs-loop">When to use /loop vs scheduled tasks</h2> The key is choosing the right tool. /loop works best for repeated checks during a live working session. If you need automation that continues running after restarts or independently of your terminal session, scheduled tasks in the desktop environment or external schedulers are better options. <ul> <li>/loop : short-lived repetition inside an active session</li> <li>Desktop scheduled tasks : longer recurring tasks that survive restarts</li> <li>External automation tools : unattended production workflows</li> </ul> <h2 id="team-workflows">How teams can use it without disrupting work</h2> For development teams, the best way to think about Agent Loops is as a session helper. <ul> <li>Monitoring deployments during release windows</li> <li>Watching CI pipelines while coding</li> <li>Tracking review activity on specific pull requests</li> <li>Running repeated checks during debugging sessions</li> </ul> They are not designed to replace infrastructure-level automation tools. <h2 id="bottom-line">The bottom line</h2> Agent Loops are not useless, and they are not a gimmick. They are simply narrower than the internet is suggesting. What Claude Code introduced is a practical mechanism for repeating prompts and monitoring tasks within an active coding session. It may not be a “24/7 autonomous agent.” But it is still a meaningful productivity upgrade for day-to-day development work.

Nano Banana 2 vs Nano Banana Pro: Speed, Quality & Real-World Tests

Feb 27, 2026

Nano Banana 2 (also known as Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is Google’s latest image generation model, positioned as “Pro-level intelligence at Flash-level speed.” That claim sounds ambitious. So instead of repeating marketing points, this article focuses on real-world tests: generation speed, text rendering, translation, subject consistency, instruction following, aspect ratios, 4K output claims, and web-grounded knowledge. <ul> <li><a href="#what-is-nb2">What Nano Banana 2 actually is</a></li> <li><a href="#speed-tests">Speed comparison: Flash vs Pro</a></li> <li><a href="#text-rendering">Text accuracy & complex layout rendering</a></li> <li><a href="#translation">Translation & localization inside images</a></li> <li><a href="#consistency">Subject & object consistency tests</a></li> <li><a href="#instruction-following">Instruction-following precision</a></li> <li><a href="#resolution">Resolution & 4K claims</a></li> <li><a href="#grounding">World knowledge & web grounding</a></li> <li><a href="#workflow-impact">Workflow impact for creators & teams</a></li> <li><a href="#final-verdict">Final verdict: Is Pro still needed?</a></li> </ul> <h2 id="what-is-nb2">What Nano Banana 2 actually is</h2> Nano Banana 2 is Google’s Flash-tier image generator designed to deliver near-Pro quality at significantly faster generation times. It is available inside Gemini and is expected to be accessible via AI Studio, Google Cloud (Vertex), and Flow. In Gemini, it appears to be widely available in many countries and can be used without a paid plan, while Nano Banana Pro is restricted to Pro/Ultra subscriptions. The positioning is clear: make Flash good enough that most people rarely need Pro. <h2 id="speed-tests">Speed comparison: Flash vs Pro</h2> In repeated side-by-side testing: <ul> <li>Nano Banana 2 generated in roughly 13–15 seconds.</li> <li>Nano Banana Pro generated in roughly 25–35 seconds.</li> </ul> That’s roughly 2× faster in most practical cases. Editing tasks (e.g., changing colors, adding logos, lighting adjustments) showed similar speed ratios. For teams producing high volumes of visual iterations — product mockups, ad variations, thumbnail tests — this speed difference compounds quickly. If you generate 50 variations per day, saving 15–20 seconds per render translates into real workflow efficiency. <h2 id="text-rendering">Text accuracy & complex layout rendering</h2> One of the most difficult tasks for image models is rendering structured, legible text. A complex test prompt included: <ul> <li>A laptop mockup</li> <li>A fictional pricing page</li> <li>Exact headlines and subheads</li> <li>A three-column comparison table</li> <li>Precise row labels</li> <li>Footnotes and fine print</li> </ul> Both Flash (Nano Banana 2) and Pro rendered the text correctly, with no gibberish, no spelling errors, and correct alignment. In this case, Flash performed at parity with Pro — but twice as fast and without requiring a paid plan. For designers creating UI mockups, landing page visuals, or presentation graphics, this is a meaningful improvement. <h2 id="translation">Translation & localization inside images</h2> A second test involved generating an English event poster and then translating it into Spanish while preserving layout, spacing, and typography. Both models handled the translation cleanly. In fact, in one instance, Flash produced a slightly more accurate localized phrasing than Pro. This suggests that for multilingual marketing teams, Nano Banana 2 is fully capable of producing localized campaign assets without manual design adjustments. The key advantage is speed: translation edits completed in ~15 seconds. <h2 id="consistency">Subject & object consistency tests</h2> Consistency across frames is critical for storytelling, short films, and multi-scene content. A test included: <ul> <li>Five distinct characters</li> <li>Fourteen objects in a room</li> <li>Follow-up prompts modifying actions and camera angles</li> </ul> Initial consistency was strong: <ul> <li>Characters retained wardrobe and facial features.</li> <li>Objects remained present and recognizable.</li> </ul> However, camera-angle changes revealed limitations. While character identity was preserved, spatial consistency of the room sometimes broke. Conclusion: strong identity retention, moderate environmental continuity. For short-form storytelling and multi-shot scenes, this is usable — but complex cinematography may still require iterative prompting. <h2 id="instruction-following">Instruction-following precision</h2> Instruction-following performance was tested with strict constraints: <ul> <li>No logos</li> <li>No extra objects</li> <li>Specific lighting direction</li> <li>Precise lens look (85mm f/5.6)</li> <li>Symmetry requirements</li> </ul> Nano Banana 2 followed these instructions accurately. Even rotational edits (e.g., rotate 15° to the right, no other changes) were executed precisely. This makes it highly practical for product photography mockups, ecommerce previews, and controlled brand visuals. <h2 id="resolution">Resolution & 4K claims</h2> Google suggests outputs up to 4K are possible. However, in testing, downloads consistently produced images at approximately 2752×1536 — not true 3840×2160 4K resolution. Even explicitly requesting 4K did not produce higher resolution outputs. That does not mean image quality is poor. Detail levels are strong, and images hold up well at full zoom. But strictly speaking, current output resolution does not appear to reach native 4K dimensions in direct export. Teams requiring exact 4K outputs for broadcast or large-format printing may need additional upscaling workflows. <h2 id="grounding">World knowledge & web grounding</h2> A test involving real-world landmark annotation (Petco Park in San Diego) showed mixed results. While the model correctly identified nearby landmarks, spatial positioning was imperfect. This suggests: <ul> <li>Good semantic knowledge</li> <li>Imperfect geographic precision</li> </ul> For infographics or educational visuals requiring strict factual mapping, human verification remains essential. <h2 id="workflow-impact">Workflow impact for creators & teams</h2> The most important shift is not feature-based. It’s behavioral. If Nano Banana 2 delivers ~95% of Pro quality at half the time and free access, it becomes the default daily driver. For teams: <ul> <li>Faster iteration loops</li> <li>Reduced cost barriers</li> <li>More experimentation</li> <li>Lower dependency on premium tiers</li> </ul> Creative workflows become less constrained by rendering time and subscription gating. Pro may remain relevant for: <ul> <li>Ultra-realism</li> <li>More advanced grounding</li> <li>Edge-case cinematic outputs</li> </ul> But for the majority of marketing, social, product mockup, and UI tasks, Nano Banana 2 appears sufficient. <h2 id="final-verdict">Final verdict: Is Pro still needed?</h2> Nano Banana 2 is not a dramatic leap beyond Pro in capability. It is a dramatic leap in accessibility and speed. Pro still edges ahead in subtle realism and some grounding tasks. But for roughly 90–95% of real-world use cases, Nano Banana 2 is fast, accurate, and consistent enough to become the default model. That makes this release strategically important. Not because it changes what’s possible but because it changes what’s practical at scale.

View all news →

Get in Touch

Want to explore how AI can work for you? Reach out today!

Contact Details

📱+32 483 520 156

Connect on LinkedIn